The few things I see that are good about that book is to get people (who aren't already doing so) to think about movement as opposed to staying on one chord for the percieved duration of that harmony. I'm trying to clear up all the clutter of harmonc equivalancies in my brain, not add more.
And to base it all on a 6 chords? why would I want to think of Eb6 when I see or want to play Cm7? Ted was against this type of thing (hence the visual root system) and so am I. But to then create a whole "house of cards sytem" from that seems far fetched and misleading. The idea of playing inversions of diminished chords between inversions of a m7 or other is as old as the hills (just listen to classical composers or Wes Montgomery). I personally think the book " Barry Harris's Harmonic Method for Guitar" is misleading and ultimately a waste of time for me at least. View Member Profile Send Email Find Member's Topics Find Member's Posts kontiki
0 kommentar(er)
